This content has been marked as final.
Show 7 replies
-
1. Re: JSR-299 Web Beans approved by the EC
nickarls Jul 10, 2007 2:53 AM (in response to gavin.king)Is there any estimation as how close the JSR-299 spec will match the current Seam implementation? Is reading up on Seam more likely to give a head start or cause confusion because it's "close but not exactly"?
-
2. Re: JSR-299 Web Beans approved by the EC
msystems Jul 10, 2007 3:26 AM (in response to gavin.king)Congratulations.
Great news.
/Kenneth -
3. Re: JSR-299 Web Beans approved by the EC
przemjaskier Jul 10, 2007 4:08 AM (in response to gavin.king)Gavin,
I see that description of this JSR covers EJB only. What about Seam's POJO components compatibility? Will it be maintained by future versions of Seam/WebBeans RI? -
4. Re: JSR-299 Web Beans approved by the EC
gavin.king Jul 10, 2007 5:15 AM (in response to gavin.king)"przemjaskier" wrote:
Gavin,
I see that description of this JSR covers EJB only. What about Seam's POJO components compatibility? Will it be maintained by future versions of Seam/WebBeans RI?
Yes, certainly. -
5. Re: JSR-299 Web Beans approved by the EC
gavin.king Jul 10, 2007 5:15 AM (in response to gavin.king)To be clear: Web Beans do not need to be EJBs.
-
6. Re: JSR-299 Web Beans approved by the EC
ellenzhao Jul 10, 2007 8:23 AM (in response to gavin.king)congratulations!
-
7. Re: JSR-299 Web Beans approved by the EC
hstang Jul 10, 2007 9:17 AM (in response to gavin.king)This is exciting news for J2EE developers. Congratulations. Gavin, thank you and your team for your hard work in this effort. Much appreciated.