This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: hibernate vs ejb3 in seam
norman.richards Feb 26, 2007 9:51 AM (in response to 600114046)I would recommend using the JPA APIs. (what you see in EJB3) You can still reach down and use hibernate-specific things if you need to.
-
2. Re: hibernate vs ejb3 in seam
bytor99999 Feb 26, 2007 12:54 PM (in response to 600114046)So it is not really a question of EJB3/JPA or Hibernate, but which implementation of EJB3/JPA are you going to use. So in the examples, the ones that say are using EJB3/JPA, yes they are following the spec, but its implementation is Hibernate.
Hibernate implements EJB3/JPA plus it add much much more on top of it.
Mark -
3. Re: hibernate vs ejb3 in seam
svadu Feb 26, 2007 6:19 PM (in response to 600114046)"norman.richards@jboss.com" wrote:
I would recommend using the JPA APIs. (what you see in EJB3) You can still reach down and use hibernate-specific things if you need to.
QFE. I prefer JPA over EJB3 but for simple reason that I run my software stack on Resin which isn't exactly EJB3 compatible atm.