This content has been marked as final.
Show 2 replies
-
1. Re: JPA or Hibernate (with JavaBeans rather than EJBs)?
christian.bauer Apr 18, 2007 5:51 PM (in response to grettke_spdr)Use JPA, and use Hibernate as a persistence provider (what other recommendation did you expect on this forum?).
If you are not happy with Hibernate, you can, instead of falling back to Hibernate annotations and APIs, use a different JPA provider. Expect that you _will_ have to use vendor-specific annotations and APIs, because the JPA standard was not designed to cover all aspects that are relevant in practice (tuning, caching, stored procedure integration, and so on). -
2. Re: JPA or Hibernate (with JavaBeans rather than EJBs)?
christian.bauer Apr 18, 2007 5:53 PM (in response to grettke_spdr)Also, this decision has _nothing_ (zero) to do with EJBs. Java Persistence providers work with any EJB container, or without any EJB container.
http://www.manning.com/bauer2