This content has been marked as final. 
    
Show                 2 replies
    
- 
        1. Re: EJB vs POJO (I don't need transactions)modoc Oct 25, 2007 5:29 PM (in response to joeyxxx)I think you've answered your question.... Go with POJOs. 
- 
        2. Re: EJB vs POJO (I don't need transactions)pmuir Oct 26, 2007 6:45 AM (in response to joeyxxx)Your post is a bit unclear, but by this What I care about the most is speed in a clustered environment I don't have a need for distribution yet neither. 
 I assume you mean your primary concern is performance of your application when running on a cluster. In this case you should certainly use EJB3 as it's more performant than POJOs on a cluster (Seam POJOs work fine, but we haven't put time into optimizing this as EJB3 has).
 
     
    