This content has been marked as final.
Show 5 replies
-
1. Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?
damianharvey Nov 6, 2007 7:59 AM (in response to dmitriy.lapko)Have you tried right-clicking on the Test in Eclipse and going 'Run As -> TestNG Test'?
Cheers,
Damian. -
2. Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?
dmitriy.lapko Nov 6, 2007 8:33 AM (in response to dmitriy.lapko)Yes, sure. But after some work it just disappeared. And I cannot say why. But even this menu just generates temp-testng-customsuite.xml instead of running tests without xml.
-
3. Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?
pmuir Nov 8, 2007 11:31 AM (in response to dmitriy.lapko)Please file a task in jira to write some docs on how to use SeamTest without TestNG (you are always going to have to do some stuff to get it working unlike with TestNG which works ootb, but lets make it possible and documented)
-
5. Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?
maxandersen Nov 8, 2007 1:34 PM (in response to dmitriy.lapko)dmitry - the testng team is very responsive on fixing issues in the testng plugin....have you reported it to them ?