RuleBasedIdentity vs CustomLdapIdentity - is it a bug
Hi,
Rule based identity is defined as follows:
@Name("org.jboss.seam.security.identity")
@Scope(SESSION)
@BypassInterceptors
@Install(precedence=FRAMEWORK, classDependencies="org.drools.WorkingMemory")
@Startup
public class RuleBasedIdentity extends Identity{...
I want to define a new class as follows:
@Name("org.jboss.seam.security.identity")
@Scope(SESSION)
@BypassInterceptors
// if com.foo.security.ldap.ActiveDirectorySupport is in the path
// then we are using active directory. It should be a mini jar file put in
// the path via the installer.
@Install(precedence=FRAMEWORK,
classDependencies="com.foo.security.ldap.ActiveDirectorySupport")
@Startup
public class ActiveDirectoryIdentity extends Identity{
However, when I do so I get errors like this:
jvm 1 | SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener jvm 1 | java.lang.IllegalStateException: Two components with the same name and precedence: org.jboss.seam.security.identity jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.addComponentDescriptor(Initialization.java:456) jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.installScannedComponentAndRoles(Initialization.java:739) jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.scanForComponents(Initialization.java:683) jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.init.Initialization.init(Initialization.java:536) jvm 1 | at org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener.contextInitialized(SeamListener.java:34) jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3830) jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4337) jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:719) jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:443) jvm 1 | at org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded.start(Embedded.java:825) jvm 1 | at com.foo.bar.tomcat.EmbeddedTomcat.startTomcat(EmbeddedTomcat.java:238)
Is this a bug or as designed?
The reason I want to do this is because when I step in the debugger watching Microsoft Active Directory JAAS the roles are not that simple. I wanted to be able to catch and inspect them and possibly massage them.
Either way, shouldn't the classDependencies be part of the unique key?
Thanks in advance.
PVM
