Future Architecture?

[charliekelly]

Will it ever be possible to deploy a "properly annotated" POJO by placing its class file into the deployment directory of the MicroContainer, or the full AS?

It seems that with a set of "reasonable defaults", there wouldn't be a need for jar files, META-INF information, and xml files.

[starksm64]

Since the ever timeframe leaves anything as a possibility, I can guarentee at some time this will be supportable. Whether a single class file is a meaningful deployment unit is a question that will set the priority of such a deployment. I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...)

[charliekelly]

If the deployment does become available, I suspect that it will be very popular.

It might establish a new development work-flow pattern.

[bkeh12]

I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...)

It seems that with a set of "reasonable defaults", there wouldn't be a need for jar files, META-INF information, and xml files.

I an sympathy with your views.

see Scripting Support in Mustang(JDK6.0) http://www.ociweb.com/jnb/jnbFeb2006.html
and Bean Scripting Framework http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/index.html

[monjbossid]

"bkeh12" wrote:

I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...)

It seems that with a set of "reasonable defaults", there wouldn't be a need for jar files, META-INF information, and xml files.

I an sympathy with your views.

see Scripting Support in Mustang(JDK6.0) http://www.ociweb.com/jnb/jnbFeb2006.html
and Bean Scripting Framework http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/index.html

Hi, is this meaning something like single class file with deployment scrits inside the same class file would be enough for deployment? cool..

[bkeh12]

Hi,

Yup .... odic :-)

[monjbossid]

"bkeh12" wrote:
Hi,

Yup .... odic :-)

Hi, I wish to see jboss microcontainer work this way as soon as possible
:-)