-
1. Re: More trouble in the bean-deployer schema
aloubyansky Apr 3, 2009 3:49 AM (in response to dmlloyd)The parsing error seems to be clear enough? There is no bean in the schema type for parameter, hence it can't appear there.
As to the schema validation errors, the group appears to be not properly redefined. The way it's redefined is supposed to be a restriction, i.e. you should list a subset of the elements/groups of the group you are redefining.
If you want extension, you should reference the group you are redefining in the new group and add the elements you want.
Looking at the schemas, the groups are identical in both schemas (with bean element commented out, btw). So, you can just remove the group as a child of redefine. -
2. Re: More trouble in the bean-deployer schema
dmlloyd Apr 3, 2009 10:49 AM (in response to dmlloyd)"alex.loubyansky@jboss.com" wrote:
The parsing error seems to be clear enough? There is no bean in the schema type for parameter, hence it can't appear there.
My point is, perhaps there should be. I believe that "bean" corresponds to BeanMetaData, which extends ValueMetaData, thus is should be usable anywhere a "value" is usable."alex.loubyansky@jboss.com" wrote:
As to the schema validation errors, the group appears to be not properly redefined. The way it's redefined is supposed to be a restriction, i.e. you should list a subset of the elements/groups of the group you are redefining.
If you want extension, you should reference the group you are redefining in the new group and add the elements you want.
Looking at the schemas, the groups are identical in both schemas (with bean element commented out, btw). So, you can just remove the group as a child of redefine.
Hm. Maybe I'll have a look at that when I get time... -
3. Re: More trouble in the bean-deployer schema
wolfgangknauf Jul 1, 2009 6:25 AM (in response to dmlloyd)The validation error is also in JIRA as part of https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMICROCONT-446
Wolfgang -
4. Re: More trouble in the bean-deployer schema
dmlloyd Jul 1, 2009 9:21 AM (in response to dmlloyd)I added a comment to that issue.