This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: priorities for pvm development
tom.baeyens Jul 5, 2007 6:22 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)i want to add number 2 1/2) : documentation, indicate which parts you would like to see documented first
-
2. Re: priorities for pvm development
mvaldes Jul 5, 2007 6:44 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)Hi Tom,
I agree on this prioritization, being the structure for persistence the ONE as you mentioned (Guillaume, will be guy on our side that will we focusing on the basic persitence)
On the test/example part I will also include the required tests for other features in addition to the nested node you proposed, what about adding also tests on the transition based execution ? We can work on that on our side.
Charles, Goulven, Marc, do you see any other item to add ?
regards,
Miguel Valdes -
3. Re: priorities for pvm development
csouillard Jul 6, 2007 9:29 AM (in response to tom.baeyens)I agree with the given order...
Maybe we can start a general discussion around other PVM services like WS API for example...