ActivityInstance removed ?

[porcherg]

In the pvm trunk, ActivityInstance interface and implementation have been removed.
Why was the ActivityInstanceImpl class removed ? Is the previous pvm behavior restored ?

We saw that when a node which is a local scope is entered, a new child execution is created. Is the concept of activity instance replaced by child executions ?

regards, Guillaume

[yuanqixun]

"porcherg" wrote:
In the pvm trunk, ActivityInstance interface and implementation have been removed.
Why was the ActivityInstanceImpl class removed ? Is the previous pvm behavior restored ?

We saw that when a node which is a local scope is entered, a new child execution is created. Is the concept of activity instance replaced by child executions ?

regards, Guillaume

I think the activityInstance can change to nodeInstance,so we can trace the node's execution. It's seem that pvm haven't the nodeInstance concept.