-
1. Re: Transactions
marklittle Feb 20, 2007 3:39 PM (in response to davidlar)Transaction support is on our to-do list. Since we have JBossTS in-house it shouldn't be a problem to integrate.
-
2. Re: Transactions
davidlar Feb 20, 2007 4:46 PM (in response to davidlar)OK, so how are people solving this today?
-
3. Re: Transactions
kurtstam Feb 20, 2007 5:39 PM (in response to davidlar)Typically ESBs are not transactional, since it is not straightforward to implement transactions spanning multiple systems. People use compensating transactions to back already comitted work back out.
--Kurt -
4. Re: Transactions
dlarsson Feb 21, 2007 6:58 AM (in response to davidlar)Wouldn't it be wise to use transaction/jms acknowledgement internally in the ESB. That would prevent loosing a message if there is a failure when a message is received from one queue, but before it is inserted into a new one.
/David -
5. Re: Transactions
marklittle Feb 21, 2007 7:06 AM (in response to davidlar)Transaction support is something we will have in place in a later release. However, end-to-end transaction semantics with traditional ACID transactions is something that doesn't really work in a loosely coupled environment such as a SOA infrastructure. That's why we worked on defining extended transaction protocols such as WS-BA.
-
6. Re: Transactions
mwax Nov 13, 2007 3:03 PM (in response to davidlar)What is the state-of-the-art in 4.2? I am looking for the simple transactional behavior requested in the original post: I want a message to be placed back on a queue if an exception occurs in a service.
-
7. Re: Transactions
marklittle Nov 14, 2007 3:32 AM (in response to davidlar)Not enough information. Are you referring to JMS, ESB or vanilla TS? Also, please create a separate forum entry if this is not related to the original posters request.