[kconner]

Hiya Claudio.

Update the code from subversion and rebuild the distribution.

[claudio_br]

Hi Kevin,

I updated my ESB.
The problem with RelatesTo was resolved.
But when I am using

throw new ActionProcessingFaultException("my exception");

I get only the the fault´s reason (String of exception).

When I am using

throw new ActionProcessingFaultException(message,"my exception");

I get a (customize) message with more detail about errors.
There is a way to catch exception throw in pipeline from message.getFault() (ActionProcessingFaultException("my exception"))? or only through ActionProcessingFaultException(message,"my exception")?

Thanks

[marklittle]

"claudio_br" wrote:
But when I am using

throw new ActionProcessingFaultException("my exception");

I get only the the fault´s reason (String of exception).

That's because you have not associated a fault Message with the exception. That is optional, but if you don't provide a Message then a default one will be created by the ESB and returned using the rules defined in the documentation. That default Message will only be able to contain information from the exception (the 'cause' in this case).

When I am using

throw new ActionProcessingFaultException(message,"my exception");

I get a (customize) message with more detail about errors.

Yes, in this case the ESB will return the Message you provide within the exception. The current implementation actually ignores any other information within the exception (e.g., the 'cause') under the assumption that the Message contains everything (which it really should do).

There is a way to catch exception throw in pipeline from message.getFault() (ActionProcessingFaultException("my exception"))? or only through ActionProcessingFaultException(message,"my exception")?

You can throw other exceptions, but as I've said elsewhere in this thread, ActionProcessingFaultException is the way you should go to get control over what Message is returned and to whom.

[claudio_br]

Ok Mark,

The development team could add to an example in quickstart with this case

Thank you for your attention.

[marklittle]

"claudio_br" wrote:
Ok Mark,

The development team could add to an example in quickstart with this case

Thank you for your attention.

Or you could contribute one ;-)