This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: handling JMS Bridge threads
timfox Apr 19, 2010 9:01 AM (in response to jmesnil)I'm not sure you'll be able to do it quite like that.
Some threads wait, e.g. batch expiry so this would prevent other threads running if using an executor.
-
2. Re: handling JMS Bridge threads
jmesnil Apr 19, 2010 9:03 AM (in response to timfox)Right. That's why I used a 3-sized thread pool so that the 3 tasks can run concurrently
-
3. Re: handling JMS Bridge threads
timfox Apr 20, 2010 11:57 AM (in response to jmesnil)Jeff Mesnil wrote:
Right. That's why I used a 3-sized thread pool so that the 3 tasks can run concurrently
Ah ok. In which case, sounds fine