-
1. Re: JBPM 3 to 4 migration. Usage without a DB
rebody May 31, 2010 9:12 PM (in response to joe_jboss)Hi Joe,
You means that you have 60 process instances on a single process defintion? And what's means 'without DB'? Do you means that you want to run jbpm4 on memory mode? I don't know whether it could be achieved. Maybe you could show us some simple samples that we could have a try. Thank you.
-
2. Re: JBPM 3 to 4 migration. Usage without a DB
joe_jboss May 31, 2010 9:45 PM (in response to rebody)I meant we have 60 process definitions with between 5 and 50 nodes in them
-
3. Re: JBPM 3 to 4 migration. Usage without a DB
rebody May 31, 2010 10:50 PM (in response to joe_jboss)Hi Joe,
Hmm~, you have 60 process definitions, and what's mean that 'no database'? Did they only execute in memory and didn't store any data into database?
-
4. Re: JBPM 3 to 4 migration. Usage without a DB
joe_jboss Jun 1, 2010 1:05 PM (in response to rebody)Yes. We load process definitions from the classpath. We attach process instances to our session data and keep it in memory. No process instance, task or other data is ever written to the datagbase. The process instance tree is garbage collected when the user logs off or times out.