Indeed, jbm nor hornetq have connection pooling. But jbm uses bisocket as connector, and this connector it looks like has its own connection pooling. Now if you use jbm with jca connection pooling (like tim recommended in article) and you use bisocket (you almost always do), you have two pools, no?
This was original question in first post of this topic.
John Waterwood wrote:
Indeed, jbm nor hornetq have connection pooling. But jbm uses bisocket as connector, and this connector it looks like has its own connection pooling. Now if you use jbm with jca connection pooling (like tim recommended in article) and you use bisocket (you almost always do), you have two pools, no?
This was original question in first post of this topic.
That would be a question for the JBM user forum. Howard (or Ron in remoting) would probably know the answer.