-
1. Re: Infinispan usecase
mircea.markus Oct 18, 2010 10:10 AM (in response to mglowacki)1 of 1 people found this helpfulThis part I believe is fine, however I would like to run infinispan on minimum two servers for better performance.
Not sure what you mean by this. Infinispan in local mode (i.e. single instance) would always be faster than infinspna in replicated/distributed mode - simply because for replicated mode you always do remote calls.
If I just run my jboss those applications will use only 1 instance of infinispan(?)
If the application you deploy only creates an DefaultCacheManager this would be a single instance.
Is it enough? Or did I loose the concept somewhere?
This should be enough, as you have the cluster formed. Can you please detail a bit on your use case? - why do you need a cluster for?
-
2. Re: Infinispan usecase
mglowacki Oct 18, 2010 11:02 AM (in response to mircea.markus)My idea is to create cluster on two separate machines in LAN - I thought I can take off some stress from primary machine where jboss is running? My experience with jboss cache 3 resulted in idea of cluster But if you say clustering will not speed up the read, then I think I can run in local mode.
-
3. Re: Infinispan usecase
mircea.markus Oct 18, 2010 11:29 AM (in response to mglowacki)1 of 1 people found this helpfulIMO, for your scenario it would only make sense to use a cluster if: a) the data infinispan holds cannot be held within AS's VM because of its size (dist would be needed for that) or b) you would need some sort of fault tollerane, i.e. if the AS's VM crashes then a restart can be initialized with whatever it had before the crash from the survining node.
-
4. Re: Infinispan usecase
mglowacki Oct 19, 2010 2:37 AM (in response to mircea.markus)thanks for clarification Mircea