-
1. Re: rich:tree - verbose tag names
nbelaevski Dec 10, 2010 1:12 PM (in response to lfryc)Hi,
Personally me like the current variant.
-
2. Re: RF4 - rich:tree - verbose tag names
lfryc Dec 10, 2010 1:22 PM (in response to nbelaevski)Yes it is about personal preference, but currently these tags
rich:treeModelAdaptor
rich:treeModelRecursiveAdaptor
have 3-4 words, it is not so easy as it can be to recognize meaning from code from other developer.
But it also depends on how much new tags rich:tree* will be added in future. :-)
-
3. Re: RF4 - rich:tree - verbose tag names
ilya_shaikovsky Dec 14, 2010 5:39 AM (in response to lfryc)no agree with Nick. I think it's simpler to undesrstand what is treeModelAdaptor rather than model (and actually it's adaptor and not a model) and recursive word alone also means something for you only because you know what is that. But it will mean less for newcomer.
About amount - I do not think it will growth much
-
4. Re: RF4 - rich:tree - verbose tag names
lfryc Dec 14, 2010 7:54 AM (in response to ilya_shaikovsky)Ok guys, you convinced me, considering that newcomers have to know out of the box what's going on is here priority.
Also I think that adding new namespace can be reasonable in case of highly used tags, but probably not here.
(Just note that I suggested improvement to tree:model and tree:recursive which gives me sense well.)