I ave two Objects, need to bind to tree and still show owner

[meghiddo]

I really need some help here.

I have a ProjectHolder Object that holds just one String value - projectName.

Then I have a DeviceHolder Object that holds a String for deviceName and a List that holds a List of channels for that Device.

I need to create a tree that has the ProjectHolder projectNames as the roots, which is easy enough and I dont neeed help with that.

But then under each projectName I need to have the DeviceHolder Object that belongs to that project as the branch underneath it.

In other words:

ProjectHolder Object 1
--DeviceHolder Object 1-1
--DeviceHolder Object 1-2
ProjectHolder Object 2
--DeviceHolder Object 2-1
--DeviceHolder Object 2-2

etc

Is this possible? Can I have two separate Objects bound to my tree and makea way so it knows which DeviceHolder Object belongs to which ProjectHolder Object?

[meghiddo]

Im looking at something like:

<rich:tree>
 <rich:treeNodesAdaptor nodes="#{projectBean.projects}" var="project">
 <rich:treeNode>
 <h:outputText value="#{project.projectName}" />
 </rich:treeNode>
 <rich:recursiveTreeNodesAdaptor roots="#{deviceBean.devices}" var="device">
 <rich:treeNode>
 <h:outputText value="#{device}" />
 </rich:treeNode>
 <rich:recursiveTreeNodesAdaptor roots="#{device.channelsList}" var="channel">
 <rich:treeNode>
 <h:outputText value="#{channel}" />
 </rich:treeNode>
 </rich:recursiveTreeNodesAdaptor>
 </rich:recursiveTreeNodesAdaptor>
 </rich:treeNodesAdaptor>
 </rich:tree>

I mean that will make a tree, but will it have the correct order and list the correct set of devices and channels under the correct project?

If not is there a way to make it recognize this?

[meghiddo]

no that wont do it, I get a bunch of projects, but under each one every single device gets listed, not just the devices belonging to the project....the channels are right though...