services file name changes from Alpha5?

[jjfraney]

I am combining JSFUnit 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT with arquillian 1.0.0.CR4 and arquillian-container-jbossas 1.0.0.CR2 (there is no CR4).

However, JSFUnit 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT was built and runs with arquillian 1.0.0.Alpha5, and it source code hasn't been coming along with arquillian.

One area for upgrade which I've discovered would be the JSFUnit's META-INF/services files.

JSFUnit uses these names:

META-INF/services/org.jboss.arquillian.spi.client.deployment.AuxiliaryArchiveAppender

META-INF/services/org.jboss.arquillian.spi.client.deployment.ApplicationArchiveProcessor

META-INF/services/org.jboss.arquillian.spi.client.deployment.ProtocolArchiveProcessor

But I don't think they are found by arquillian.  I think arquillian would find them in a different package:

META-INF/services/org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.client.deployment.AuxiliaryArchiveAppender

META-INF/services/org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.client.deployment.ApplicationArchiveProcessor

META-INF/services/org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.spi.client.deployment.ProtocolArchiveProcessor

Is there a way I can workaround this with arquillian without a code change to JSFUnit?

I expected to put these files, same content as jsfunit, in my test classpath, but it doesn't seem to be working.  I set debug break points in the jsfunit classes named in the files, and they don't get triggered.

[aslak]

That's correct, SPIs are no longer loaded as individual SPIs, but loaded via the LoadableExtension SPI where the impl can register the other Services and Observers etc...

But we're in the process of releasing JSFUnit with Arq Beta level support.. if you build this jsfunit locally, it should work:

https://github.com/jsfunit/jsfunit

[jjfraney]

Thanks.  Wow.  Thanks.

I had been referring to the svn repo.  Thanks.