Does richfaces support dynamic multiple tables

[nightwend]

I'd like to show a page with dynamic multiple tables, each table has different columns. I tried it to put the dataTable in a repeat but it seems the rich:columns is processed before ui:repeat.

Any ideas?

<ui:repeat value="#{MyBean.tables}" var="table">
 <rich:dataTable value="#{table.rows}" var="row">
 <rich:columns value="#{table.columns}" var="col" index="index">
 <f:facet name="header">
 <h:outputText value="#{col.title}" />
 </f:facet>
 <h:outputText value="#{row.get(index)}"/>
 </rich:columns>
 </rich:dataTable>
 <br />
 <br />
</ui:repeat>

[ilya_shaikovsky]

yes, and you should use c:forEach or binding instead of repeat..

[nightwend]

"ilya_shaikovsky" wrote:
yes, and you should use c:forEach or binding instead of repeat..

Could please show me some simple examples or ideas? I am new to richfaces.

[ilya_shaikovsky]

just define forEach instead of repeat in the same way.

[nightwend]

"ilya_shaikovsky" wrote:
just define forEach instead of repeat in the same way.

Thank you very much.
It works after refer to xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jstl/core" in the root element and modified the code to:

<c:forEach items="#{MyBean.tables}" var="table">
 <rich:dataTable value="#{table.rows}" var="row">
 <rich:columns value="#{table.columns}" var="col" index="index">
 <f:facet name="header">
 <h:outputText value="#{col.title}" />
 </f:facet>
 <h:outputText value="#{row.get(index)}"/>
 </rich:columns>
 </rich:dataTable>
 <br />
 <br />
</c:forEach>

[simonkelly]

I also want to display a page with multiple dynamic tables, with varying columns and was experiencing the same problems. I successfully rewrote the repeat tag as a c:foreach as suggested but now I lose the ability to rerender the page without a full, and unacceptably expensive, view refresh. So I am looking for an alternative solution which would allow me to display multiple dynamic tables while also being able to do a targetted refresh of the page's content. Any suggestions? You mentioned binding as an alternative approach, can you specify this?