Question about @Current binding type, inheritance and specialization.

[nix]

I don't have clear understanding situation with @Current and @Specializes.
Let's consider cases :

class Bean1 {
}

@Binding1
@Specializes
class Beans2 extends Bean1{
}

Does Bean2 have @Current binding in this situation ?

@Binding1
class Bean1 {
}

@Specializes
class Bean2 extends Bean1{
}

Does Bean2 @Current binding in this situation ?

Suppose @Bindnig2 is Inherited binding.
Consider case :

@Binding2
class Bean1 {
}

class Bean2 extends Bean1{
}

Does Bean2 @Current binding in this situation ?

[pmuir]

Denis Anisimov wrote on Jul 30, 2009 13:14:


I don't have clear understanding situation with @Current and @Specializes.
Let's consider cases :

class Bean1 {
}

@Binding1
@Specializes
class Beans2 extends Bean1{
}

Does Bean2 have @Current binding in this situation ?

No, it's not a declared binding, but an implicit binding (see 4.3.1 in the spec).

@Binding1
class Bean1 {
}

@Specializes
class Bean2 extends Bean1{
}

Does Bean2 @Current binding in this situation ?

Yes. The bindings include all bindings of Bean2 and declared bindings of Bean1.

Suppose @Binding2 is Inherited binding.
Consider case :

@Binding2
class Bean1 {
}

class Bean2 extends Bean1{
}

Does Bean2 @Current binding in this situation ?

No, Bean2 will have a binding, @Binding2 before specialization is taken into account, this means the default binding won't be added.

I added https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBTCK-37 to make sure we verify this in the TCK.

[nix]

Thank you.