This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: why ConversationManager is not in jsr299?
nickarls Dec 15, 2009 10:27 AM (in response to alin.heyoulin.qq.com)So that there would be freedom of implementation in how to handle the conversation. There can be JSF, HTTP, SE etc based implementations and support for nested/natural conversations in others..
-
2. Re: why ConversationManager is not in jsr299?
alin.heyoulin.qq.com Dec 15, 2009 11:02 AM (in response to alin.heyoulin.qq.com)I want my project to support both weld and openwebbeans. but how to handle Conversation just using cdi api?
-
3. Re: why ConversationManager is not in jsr299?
nickarls Dec 15, 2009 1:01 PM (in response to alin.heyoulin.qq.com)Well the Conversation interface is standard and any ConversationManager will per definition use that.