This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: Injection vs. Eclipse debug
joblini Nov 18, 2008 4:10 AM (in response to joblini)Sorry, should be
@Name("rolePickListBean")
-
2. Re: Injection vs. Eclipse debug
diegocoronel Nov 18, 2008 1:52 PM (in response to joblini)Try expanding handle variable and after expand target variable.
-
3. Re: Injection vs. Eclipse debug
joblini Nov 18, 2008 4:48 PM (in response to joblini)Ah yes, I can see the value under hander/bean/result. Thanks!
rolePickListBean org.agritrace.action.admin.user.RolePickListBean_$$_javassist_11 (id=347) handler org.jboss.seam.intercept.JavaBeanInterceptor (id=346) bean org.agritrace.action.admin.user.RolePickListBean (id=337) result java.util.Arrays$ArrayList<E> (id=2760) beanClass java.lang.Class<T> (org.agritrace.action.admin.user.RolePickListBean) (id=260) component org.jboss.seam.Component (id=503) componentName "rolePickListBean" (id=505) dirty true isSeamComponent true type org.jboss.seam.annotations.intercept.InterceptorType (id=507) userInterceptors java.util.ArrayList<E> (id=509) result null
-
4. Re: Injection vs. Eclipse debug
max.max.andersen.jboss.com Nov 20, 2008 12:58 PM (in response to joblini)This question reminded me that Eclipse Debuggers actually have a notion of showing
Logical Structures
instead of the raw form of the object.See here for a good explanation of it http://blog.jcake.com/2008/03/09/eclipse-debugger-part-ii-logical-structures/
Unfortunately the user UI just matches on qualified type names which is a not scalable for $$javaassist classes;
but it might be doable to do it programmatically.I've created https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBIDE-3229 to track if for JBoss Tools.
Feel free to contribute a patch/comment ;)