-
1. Re: JSR-299
nickarls Apr 15, 2009 1:00 PM (in response to pragun1)My recommendation is to have a read through the specs and then go with Seam 2 but staying clear of stuff that you didn't see in the specs (as such features might have a harder migration path). Examples might be outjection, named entity beans etc... If your used features are mostly compatible you might get away with a renaming of the annotations and some minor tunings to have a
clean
JCDI application.I understand there is a
compatibility layer
upcoming but why drag in legacy stuff if you can avoid it when starting fresh... -
2. Re: JSR-299
pragun1 Apr 15, 2009 1:56 PM (in response to pragun1)Thanks Nicklas for your inputs !
-
3. Re: JSR-299
swd847 Apr 15, 2009 2:17 PM (in response to pragun1)The other big thing to consider is that as far as I am aware there is no release schedule for seam 3, and I can't really see work begining on it until after web beans goes GA. I am only guessing here, but I don't think we will see seam 3 go GA before the end of 09.
-
4. Re: JSR-299
pragun1 Apr 15, 2009 4:38 PM (in response to pragun1)Indeed...this is the most important topic in our project at the moment
we are planning to complete one small project using Seam2.1.x and major business enterprise project can be started with Seam3 with some delay
Thanks for your suggestion Stuart :)
-
5. Re: JSR-299
joblini Apr 16, 2009 4:43 AM (in response to pragun1)Be sure to check out Pete Muir's blog post State of Seam
At the same time, we'll be pushing ahead with Seam 3, so expect an alpha in the next few months. -
6. Re: JSR-299
pragun1 Apr 16, 2009 11:55 AM (in response to pragun1)that's a great news for Seam lovers :)
-
7. Re: JSR-299
pragun1 Jun 26, 2009 6:48 PM (in response to pragun1)It was worth waiting for 2 months. Have a look
http://relation.to/Bloggers/JSR299ProposedFinalDraftSubmittedExpecting final release in August, in time for the Java EE 6 release in September :)
great news for JEE world !