Proposal for renaming ClientFacade and ServerFacade

[ssilvert]

I think the previous post demonstrates a need to possibly rename ClientFacade and ServerFacade. While these two names accurately describe the function of the classes they do not describe their form. For instance, from the name "ClientFacade" it is not obvious that each new instance clears the session.

So if we are going to make a change, I think it is best to do it before beta. What do you guys think of the following changes?

"ClientFacade" is renamed to "JSFClientSession".
"ServerFacade" is renamed to "JSFServerSession".

We want the class name to accurately describe what the class is. Here are links to the JavaDoc so you can see the API:
ClientFacade
ServerFacade

Thoughts?

Stan
http://www.jsfunit.org

[jkva]

+1 from me.

ClientSession and ServerSession is definitely better than the Facade naming.

[pieter.kuijpers]

I too think that JSFClientSession and JSFServerSession are better names than Facade.

Another option would be to use 'JSFClientConversation' and 'JSFServerConversation', like it is used in HttpUnit. I'm not sure about the name ServerConversation though, as it doesn't seem to be a real 'conversation' on the server side.