-
1. Re: Cyclic Dependency Injection
pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com Jun 3, 2010 9:52 AM (in response to pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com)Forgot to include sample button to run the test.
<a4j:commandButton value="Test Injection" action="#{testA.testBInjection}" />
-
2. Re: Cyclic Dependency Injection
pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com Jun 9, 2010 5:30 AM (in response to pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com)6 days later and no replies - anybody have any idea?
-
3. Re: Cyclic Dependency Injection
chits98 Jun 9, 2010 3:20 PM (in response to pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com)Only that it seems to work fine in Seam 2.1.1.GA
-
4. Re: Cyclic Dependency Injection
pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com Jun 10, 2010 6:00 AM (in response to pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com)Hi Pauline,
Thanks for testing this, you've been a great help.
That seems to be it. I got one of the guys to test the code against version 2.2.0 GA and it works fine. We're in the process of moving over to this new version so this issue will go away then.
Funny that it is only a problem in the newer release candidate, but not in the old or new GA versions!
Thanks,
Philip
-
5. Re: Cyclic Dependency Injection
kragoth Jun 10, 2010 7:36 PM (in response to pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com)I reported this as a bug some time ago so maybe they fixed it now. :)
It was not always a problem just came up in some versions. :)
I'd have to go find the JIRA to work out what versions it was found in but, meh. :P
But, if the issue is fixed in the latest GA release then I might have to look at upgrading instead of using my ugly work around.
-
6. Re: Cyclic Dependency Injection
pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com Jun 11, 2010 4:34 AM (in response to pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com)Thanks for the update Tim.
BTW, I love your interjection 'meh' and even more the people who obviously have too much time on their hands to write this wiki article about it (Meh)
-
7. Re: Cyclic Dependency Injection
kragoth Jun 15, 2010 7:14 PM (in response to pmurphy.pjmurphy.paddypower.com)
Philip Murphy wrote on Jun 11, 2010 04:34:
Thanks for the update Tim.
BTW, I love your interjection 'meh' and even more the people who obviously have too much time on their hands to write this wiki article about it (Meh)I almost find it disturbing that there is a wiki article devoted to the word
Meh
. But, I think it still falls into the funny category! :)I'll never be able to use the word
meh
again without thinking of this.Cheers for the laugh.
Tim