-
1. Re: git cleanup
clebert.suconic Mar 27, 2012 7:27 PM (in response to ataylor)yes, we need to remove the _PENDING tags
The only branches that should exist on the main repository are these:
- Branch_2_2_EAP
- Branch_2_2_AS7
- one-offs (*)
* for the one-offs, we should recreate them properly...
And maybe.. the one-off don't even need to be on the main repo.. maybe we could have a separate project for one-offs.
Any other working branch should be on our clones (like your i18n_logging)
Do you think you could do this cleanup?
-
2. Re: git cleanup
clebert.suconic Mar 27, 2012 7:28 PM (in response to clebert.suconic)All these branches are garbage anyway.. the only working branch that should be preserved now is your i18n and that could be in your clone only (no need to be on the main repo)
-
3. Re: git cleanup
gaohoward Mar 27, 2012 10:28 PM (in response to ataylor)STOMP11
STOMP11_PERF
hornetq-416
stomp_1_1
HnetQ_323_cn
HORNETQ-681
Branch_2_2_EAP_hq782
those are not used so please delete them.
-
4. Re: git cleanup
ataylor Mar 28, 2012 3:10 AM (in response to gaohoward)ok, take a look at mt repo https://github.com/andytaylor/hornetq/branches, apart from the i18n_logging branch this is what we will have. The one offs I will deal with separately. If ok i will make these changes upstream, shout now if i have deleted any branches you need
-
5. Re: git cleanup
ataylor Mar 28, 2012 3:11 AM (in response to ataylor)also is everyone ok with me deleting the pending tags?
-
-
7. Re: git cleanup
ataylor Mar 28, 2012 3:40 AM (in response to gaohoward)fyi i have just cloned my repo again with the branches and pending tags deleted and it took less than 3 mins
-
8. Re: git cleanup
borges Mar 28, 2012 7:37 AM (in response to ataylor)Andy Taylor wrote:
also is everyone ok with me deleting the pending tags?
+1: delete all the garbage.
-
9. Re: git cleanup
clebert.suconic Mar 28, 2012 8:28 AM (in response to ataylor)Andy Taylor wrote:
fyi i have just cloned my repo again with the branches and pending tags deleted and it took less than 3 mins
That's great!
Can you make these changes upstream as well?
-
10. Re: git cleanup
ataylor Mar 28, 2012 9:10 AM (in response to ataylor)done.
All we need to do now is sort the one offs, tbh i am not really sure what these are?
If anyone wants a script to clean up their own repo, catch me offline
-
11. Re: git cleanup
clebert.suconic Mar 28, 2012 11:27 AM (in response to ataylor)STOMP_11 also needs to go
-
12. Re: git cleanup
ataylor Mar 29, 2012 8:54 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)weird that doesnt appear on https://github.com/hornetq/hornetq/branches
-
13. Re: git cleanup
ataylor Mar 29, 2012 9:20 AM (in response to ataylor)regarding the one offs, its done something weird by creating directories instead of actual branches, im trying to find the parent commit so i can replay them nd create new branches, anyone got any ideas?
-
14. Re: git cleanup
clebert.suconic Mar 29, 2012 1:29 PM (in response to ataylor)Just to complete the thread those are going to live on SVN (unless we need to maintain them.. which I don't think that will be the case.. new one-offs can be created)..
This is just as we talked on IRC.. wanted to record that here on the forum for future reference.