-
1. Re: MBean slows down queue?
ataylor May 10, 2012 5:41 AM (in response to dimar)how are you using the jmx MBean
-
2. Re: MBean slows down queue?
dimar May 10, 2012 5:49 AM (in response to ataylor)Through the JBoss JMX console.
-
3. Re: MBean slows down queue?
ataylor May 10, 2012 6:14 AM (in response to dimar)I can only assume that the jmx console is polling the queue, what happens if you shut the jmx console down
-
4. Re: MBean slows down queue?
clebert.suconic May 10, 2012 5:34 PM (in response to dimar)1 of 1 people found this helpfulThis was improved on the latest release.
-
5. Re: MBean slows down queue?
dimar May 13, 2012 5:49 AM (in response to ataylor)@Andy: I didn't get a chance to try this yet. When I tried to reproduce, it was the other way around: the queue processing was good, but the JMX console was unresponsive. Sounds like be a locking issue, although the IO load is also quite high (when the bridge is enabled).
-
6. Re: MBean slows down queue?
dimar May 13, 2012 5:48 AM (in response to clebert.suconic)@Clebert: Thanks for the info. Do you have some more info (is there a Jira ticket?)
-
7. Re: MBean slows down queue?
dimar Jun 18, 2012 3:49 PM (in response to dimar)The latest release (2.2.14) did improve things a bit, but we got a much better result when we replaced the core bridge by a JMS-bridge.
About 100 messages per second travel through the system. Monitoring queues through the JMX console would lead to high response times. Replacing the core bridge with the JMS bridge solved it for us.
It does seem other (related) issues were resolved in 2.2.14. During a stresstest, the throughput collapsed after about 5-10 minutes (using 2.2.5-Final). 2.2.14 holds up much better.