-
1. Re: HornetQ 2.3 expected release date
fuinhaazul Jul 6, 2012 7:06 AM (in response to yglass)I agree that replication is crucial on the project. My actual problem https://community.jboss.org/message/746491#746491 i think that can be workarounded if replication was working, because when bindinds files is corrupted, the backup server can continue the process (just like a backup of persistent files).
Sometime ago I saw on the forum a question about "why use database to store data when the journals is faster....". Well, I think i found a reason. I can not do backups on a running instance, and of course, I can´t stop the server manually every day to do that.
-
2. Re: HornetQ 2.3 expected release date
ataylor Jul 6, 2012 8:57 AM (in response to yglass)We're in the process of deploying HornetQ to production. As we need a highly available solution, we're using shared storage. We see this as a stopgap measure to get HornetQ through the door, but without a replication based solution, we will have problems deploying HornetQ in the future.
So .. my question to the forum is: is there an expected release date for HornetQ 2.3, which will support H/A via replication and not just by shared storage?
We should have a beta available in the next couple of weeks.
I agree that replication is crucial on the project. My actual problem https://community.jboss.org/message/746491#746491 i think that can be workarounded if replication was working, because when bindinds files is corrupted, the backup server can continue the process (just like a backup of persistent files).
Im not sure why you think that replication would fix your issue.
Sometime ago I saw on the forum a question about "why use database to store data when the journals is faster....". Well, I think i found a reason. I can not do backups on a running instance, and of course, I can´t stop the server manually every day to do that.
Try not to hijack other peoples threads
-
3. Re: HornetQ 2.3 expected release date
fuinhaazul Jul 6, 2012 9:05 AM (in response to ataylor)We should have a beta available in the next couple of weeks.
Excelent!
Im not sure why you think that replication would fix your issue.
I think (of course, i´m not sure), that if I have a backup server, data corruption is more dificult to happen
Try not to hijack other peoples threads
Sorry, this was not my intention.