This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: One-to-Many Relationship with a Dependent Value Class
guhi Mar 20, 2002 8:26 AM (in response to alice_adler01)If you store address as a dependant value class it will not be stored in a table of its own but as a blob (as far as I understand the specs). You can configure jboss to store the components of a dependant value class but it won't be stored in a table of its own.
So you really have to store the addresses as entity beans so they are in a table of their own. Is there any reason not to do so?
-Gunnar -
2. Re: One-to-Many Relationship with a Dependent Value Class
alice_adler01 Mar 20, 2002 8:02 PM (in response to alice_adler01)I was just confirming that there is no other way to do that except creating as an entity bean. Seemed like an "Address " isn't granular enough to be declared as an entity bean.
Thanks for the help. -
3. Re: One-to-Many Relationship with a Dependent Value Class
dsundstrom Mar 20, 2002 8:10 PM (in response to alice_adler01)You really only need to worry about granularity on remote interfaces.