-
1. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
jaikiran Aug 8, 2012 1:47 AM (in response to thinksteep)Can you try this against latest nightly build? I think there were some fixes in this area, although I don't remember if that was for 7.1.1 or later. See if there's an improvement in the latest builds.
-
2. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
nickarls Aug 8, 2012 5:51 AM (in response to thinksteep)We had slowdown issues on a 7.1.1 that appeared to have eased by downgrading the JSF implementation to 2.1.3. Might be that latest trunk contains some implementation that addresses the issue, haven't checked.
-
3. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
thinksteep Aug 8, 2012 10:12 AM (in response to jaikiran)Hi Jaikiran/Nicklas, Thanks for quick response. http://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-7.0.x-Windows/ Do I need to get nightly build from above location? Thank you,
-
4. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
thinksteep Aug 8, 2012 5:50 PM (in response to jaikiran)Hi Jaikiran,
Are these nightly builds, I need to build from source (or) It is just download the ZIP file and extract (like how we do GA versions)?
If this issue is fixed in nightly build, is there any timeline on when next release of Jboss will be available?
Thanks for your time and help.
-
-
6. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
thinksteep Aug 14, 2012 11:55 AM (in response to jaikiran)Hi Jaikiran, How are you? It seems nightly build is lot better in terms of containing the memory leak issue (JBoss-7.2-ALPHA build). We are doing more testing. Now, our question is, Is there any time line for JBoss 7.2 release? We have production scheduled for early Sept. If no timeline for JBoss 7.2 release, is there any way we can patch Jboss 7.1.1 with these memory leak fixes? Your input will help us in finalizing an approach. Thanks for your time.
-
7. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
danielk Jan 9, 2013 8:05 AM (in response to thinksteep)Any news on fixes for memory leaks in JBoss AS 7.1.1.final?
-
8. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
ssilvert Jan 9, 2013 8:27 AM (in response to danielk)Daniel Ku wrote:
Any news on fixes for memory leaks in JBoss AS 7.1.1.final?
This can cause a memory leak for view-scoped beans: http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-2561. It is fixed in Mojarra 2.1.16 and AS7.2. Mojarra 2.1.17 has just been released and I'm evaluating it right now.
To hack a fix in AS7.1.x:
- Put the jsf-api jar in <JBOSS_HOME>/modules/javax/faces/api/main. Update modules.xml accordingly.
- Put the jsf-impl jar in <JBOSS_HOME>/modules/com/sun/jsf-impl/main. Update modules.xml accordingly.
If anyone has information on another JSF leak please open a jira and assign to me.
Thanks,
Stan Silvert
-
9. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
danielk Jan 9, 2013 10:59 AM (in response to ssilvert)Thanks for the fast response. JSF 2.1.17 i have already configured (2.1.16 has crucial bugs for ViewScoped beans) in JBoss AS 7.1.1.final. Is there any roadmap (date), when AS7.2 will be released as community version?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel
PS: Is jsf-impl dependency not needed anymore in module.xml for jsf API?
-
10. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
ssilvert Jan 9, 2013 11:25 AM (in response to danielk)Daniel Ku wrote:
As far as I know, the dependency is still needed. Do you have some information that indicates that the issue with that has been resolved?
Stan
-
11. Re: jsf 2 & Jboss possible memory leak
ssilvert Jan 9, 2013 11:29 AM (in response to ssilvert)Stan Silvert wrote:
Daniel Ku wrote:
As far as I know, the dependency is still needed. Do you have some information that indicates that the issue with that has been resolved?
Stan
Let me correct that. As I recall, JSF API depends on JSF impl for JSF 2.2. For JSF 2.1, the dependency declaration is not needed.
But this might be fixed for JSF 2.2 now. I don't know.