-
1. Re: mySQL and XADataSource
davidjencks May 16, 2002 9:06 AM (in response to jgeisler)If you look closely, you will find that the mysql "xa" is a fake xa wrapper with no xa semantics. I think it's simpler to stick with the local wrapper where we know the sharing is appropriate within one transaction.
-
2. Re: mySQL and XADataSource
jgeisler May 18, 2002 4:13 PM (in response to jgeisler)I just wondered if LocalTransaction means that if I have all my EntityBeans in one DBMS that transactions are fully supported.
Jens -
3. Re: mySQL and XADataSource
davidjencks May 18, 2002 10:12 PM (in response to jgeisler)As long as you don't include other things like transacted jms messages in the same transaction you will be fine. If you only use mysql local transactions are adequate.
-
4. Re: mySQL and XADataSource
pylet May 21, 2002 10:21 PM (in response to jgeisler)> If you look closely, you will find that the mysql
> "xa" is a fake xa wrapper with no xa semantics.
Yes, as MySQL doesn't support XA (yet, I'm pushing for it). This XADataSource implementation was meant to be used where there were no other options, which is not the case in JBoss.