This content has been marked as final.
Show 4 replies
-
1. Re: JSPF not processed as JSP
jaikiran Jul 12, 2013 5:35 AM (in response to rdiddly)What are JSPF files and how are they different from JSP files? I haven't heard of them before.
-
2. Re: JSPF not processed as JSP
rdiddly Jul 12, 2013 5:38 AM (in response to jaikiran)They are jsp files except that they're fragments. They're usually <jsp:include>'d into what's delivered to a browser. Just a naming convention. At one point in time, back when Sun owned the whole shebang, it was recommended that if you wrote jsp fragments that might be included in multiple pages, you should name them with a jspf extension.
-
3. Re: JSPF not processed as JSP
jfclere Jul 17, 2013 3:04 AM (in response to rdiddly)So are the fragments included in the jsp are not processed?
-
4. Re: JSPF not processed as JSP
jfclere Jul 17, 2013 11:35 AM (in response to rdiddly)After thinking to it it is probably your web.xml that has been modified to process the jspf like jsp, could you check that?