-
1. Re: TTALE-13 (support for RAR)
jesper.pedersen Jul 22, 2013 1:54 PM (in response to twogee)Sort of, yes.
You can see packaging requirements here - http://www.ironjacamar.org/doc/userguide/1.1/en-US/html/ch05.html#packagingrequirements
Note, that a lot of .rar archives package .class files directly in the .rar/ - wrong, but what can you do ? Well, other than flag it. TTALE should consider these archives though.
-
2. Re: TTALE-13 (support for RAR)
twogee Jul 23, 2013 5:46 AM (in response to jesper.pedersen)WarArchive does not care where it finds .class files, so it is suitable for the task.
-
3. Re: TTALE-13 (support for RAR)
jesper.pedersen Jul 23, 2013 3:21 PM (in response to twogee)I meant that the archive checks should follow the classloader semantics defined in the various specs, and if possible take vendor extensions into account.
-
4. Re: TTALE-13 (support for RAR)
twogee Jul 25, 2013 7:06 AM (in response to jesper.pedersen)Oops, I meant WarScanner in my previous post... which results in RAR being treated as a WarArchive.
What you discuss sounds like a suitable ClassLoaderStructure, which is of course relevant, but outside the scope from my point of view.
-
5. Re: TTALE-13 (support for RAR)
jesper.pedersen Jul 25, 2013 11:35 AM (in response to twogee)Eh, what ? .rar files shouldn't be picked up by the WarScanner. The classloading semantics is different.
-
6. Re: TTALE-13 (support for RAR)
twogee Jul 25, 2013 3:29 PM (in response to jesper.pedersen)Why not? AFAICS Scanners care only about archive structure, classloading semantics is of interest for Reports extending CLSReport, and by extension, for relevant ClassLoaderStructures.
Did I miss something?