-
1. Re: DeliveringCount higher than number of connected consumers with consumer-window-size=0
trondgzi Sep 18, 2013 11:41 AM (in response to trondgzi)Logs on the server are full of these:
2013-09-18 16:31:42,701 WARN [Thread-2 (HornetQ-scheduled-threads-17550809)] [org.hornetq.core.transaction.impl.ResourceManagerImpl] [] [] transaction with xid XidImpl (1891372116 bq:0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.-1.-1.10.-96.12.51.99.-92
.-84.4.82.57.-107.-73.0.3.-128.-11.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 formatID:131077 gtxid:0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.-1.-1.10.-96.12.51.99.-92.-84.4.82.57.-107.-73.0.3.-128.-12.49 base64:AAAAAAAAAAAAAP__CqAMM2OkrARSOZW3AAOA9QAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP__Cq
AMM2OkrARSOZW3AAOA9DEHAgIA timed out
2013-09-18 16:31:42,702 WARN [Thread-46 (HornetQ-server-HornetQServerImpl::serverUUID=1f560cc2-058c-11e3-8c36-15d997702512-932141844)] [org.hornetq.core.server.impl.QueueImpl] [] [] Error on checkDLQ: java.lang.IllegalStateExcep
tion: Cannot find add info 47014456
at org.hornetq.core.journal.impl.JournalImpl.appendUpdateRecord(JournalImpl.java:910) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at org.hornetq.core.persistence.impl.journal.JournalStorageManager.updateDeliveryCount(JournalStorageManager.java:845) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at org.hornetq.core.server.impl.QueueImpl.checkRedelivery(QueueImpl.java:1972) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at org.hornetq.core.server.impl.QueueImpl$RefsOperation.afterRollback(QueueImpl.java:2382) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at org.hornetq.core.transaction.impl.TransactionImpl.afterRollback(TransactionImpl.java:516) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at org.hornetq.core.transaction.impl.TransactionImpl$4.done(TransactionImpl.java:376) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at org.hornetq.core.persistence.impl.journal.OperationContextImpl$1.run(OperationContextImpl.java:239) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at org.hornetq.utils.OrderedExecutorFactory$OrderedExecutor$1.run(OrderedExecutorFactory.java:100) [hornetq-core-2.2.21.Final.jar:2.2.21.SNAPSHOT (HQ_2_2_21_final, 122)]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724) [rt.jar:1.7.0_25]
And on the clients the logs are full of these:
2013-09-18 16:25:39,131 WARN [Periodic Recovery] [com.arjuna.ats.jta] [] [] ARJUNA016038: No XAResource to recover < formatId=131077, gtrid_length=29, bqual_length=36, tx_uid=0:ffff0aa00c33:-569a1ddb:52397c1b:ba42, node_name=1,
branch_uid=0:ffff0aa00c33:-569a1ddb:52397c1b:ba43, subordinatenodename=null, eis_name=unknown eis name >
-
2. Re: DeliveringCount higher than number of connected consumers with consumer-window-size=0
clebert.suconic Sep 18, 2013 3:31 PM (in response to trondgzi)1 of 1 people found this helpfulOnce the message gets on redelivery, it will do scheduled redelivery.. which will be in delivering.
It seems you have a lot of scheduled redeliveries. I would recommend you updating HornetQ. You could either get a newer version of JBoss. or if you must stay on that version, you could replace hornetq libraries by the one on the 2.3.x branch. (it's pretty stable.. we use it for EAP releases).
Only drawback is JBoss has the client libraries on the jboss-all-client (forgot the name), so you would have to unzip it.. replace it.. and take it back.
Although your best option is to get a newer version of JBoss, since we may have changed something on the integrations.
-
3. Re: DeliveringCount higher than number of connected consumers with consumer-window-size=0
clebert.suconic Sep 18, 2013 3:34 PM (in response to clebert.suconic)1 of 1 people found this helpfulAt least a workaround is to disable scheduled redelivery. you may add a sleep on your MDB if deliveryCount > 0 to avoid bursting your Database in case of deadlocks and other issues on the DB.
Watch out also for the DLQ settings.
(Just to let you know.. sometimes I ask question trying to nail down a problem.. on this case I'm pretty sure this is what's happening).
-
4. Re: DeliveringCount higher than number of connected consumers with consumer-window-size=0
trondgzi Sep 18, 2013 4:36 PM (in response to clebert.suconic)Hi Clebert,
you are correct about a lot of redeliveries. When the performance issues occur we get a lot of transaction timeouts on the clients which will cause redelivery. The queue has redelivery-delay=2000 and max-delivery-attempts=2. I suspected that the redelivery mechanism was using scheduled delivery, but I was not sure since ScheduledCount remains 0 when this happens.
I found the JIRA link you provided while googling earlier, but I dismissed the relevance since the JIRA issue has Fix Version/s: 2.2.8.Final and I'm using 2.2.21.Final.
Upgrading JBoss and/or HornetQ is not something I can do for at least 2-3 months, but implementing sleep in the MDB should be an easy fix, although I would consider this a sub-par solution. I will try to make a test case to replicate the issue, and try to verify that it behaves differently with the 2.3.x branch. Hopefully this will make it easier to get approval for upgrading JBoss...
-
5. Re: DeliveringCount higher than number of connected consumers with consumer-window-size=0
clebert.suconic Sep 18, 2013 6:34 PM (in response to trondgzi)U right... I thought 2.2.1 when I read 2.2.21...
I looked at the scheduled redelivery and I don't see a lot of difference in logic between 2.2.21 and 2.2.x
There are lots of differences on the delivery handling since I've removed quite a few locks and fixed other issues.
Your issue is definitely related to scheduled redelivery. I would be interested in know what happened so you're still having that issue. maybe a replicator would be help us to fix it further. but you would have to evaluate it on the latest versions.
you should probably look at disabling scheduled redelivery as we talked till here.