Configuration of an Arquillian Extension

[asotobu]

Hello I am developing an extension and I need that users configure some parameters. I have done next steps:

Create a MocoConfigurator class which listens for arquillian descriptor:

    @Inject
    @ApplicationScoped
    private InstanceProducer<MocoConfiguration> configurationProvider;
    
    public void configure(@Observes ArquillianDescriptor arquillianDescriptor) {
        
        Map<String, String> config = arquillianDescriptor.extension(EXTENSION_NAME).getExtensionProperties();
        configurationProvider.set(MocoConfiguration.fromMap(config));
    }

Then I have added MocoConfiguration class to extension archive:

@Override
  public Archive<?> createAuxiliaryArchive() {

   return ShrinkWrap.create(JavaArchive.class, "arquillian-moco.jar")
              .addClass(ReflectionHelper.class)
              .addPackage(Moco.class.getPackage())
              .addPackage(MocoRemoteExtension.class.getPackage())
              .addClass(MocoConfiguration.class)
              .addAsServiceProvider(RemoteLoadableExtension.class, MocoRemoteExtension.class);

  }

Then in extension class I have registered the observer:

@Override
  public void register(ExtensionBuilder builder) {

  builder.service(ApplicationArchiveProcessor.class,
  MocoDependencyArchiveProcessor.class);
  builder.service(AuxiliaryArchiveAppender.class,
  MocoArchiveAppender.class);

  builder.observer(MocoConfigurator.class);

  }

The instance is required in container side so I have added next line on a class that is executed in remote side.

@Inject
private Instance<MocoConfiguration> config;

The problem is that when I use this code the class is not executed but no error is thrown, but if I comment the previous line and I hardcoded the port then it works, so it seems I have missed something to do so this can work on remote side. Am I wrong= What I have missed?

Thank you so much for your help.

And finally I have added the information inside arquillian.xml (which is configured to use Servlet protocol).

The problem is that although the information is loaded correctly

[asotobu]

Bartosz has noted me the solution. In container remote part you cannot inject configuration values, so the workaround is put these properties into a properties file, send to remote part and then in remote part deserialize the file into a class again.