This content has been marked as final.
Show 6 replies
-
1. Re: Future Architecture?
starksm64 Mar 13, 2006 2:06 PM (in response to charliekelly)Since the ever timeframe leaves anything as a possibility, I can guarentee at some time this will be supportable. Whether a single class file is a meaningful deployment unit is a question that will set the priority of such a deployment. I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...)
-
2. Re: Future Architecture?
charliekelly Mar 13, 2006 3:03 PM (in response to charliekelly)If the deployment does become available, I suspect that it will be very popular.
It might establish a new development work-flow pattern. -
3. Re: Future Architecture?
bkeh12 Mar 13, 2006 8:02 PM (in response to charliekelly)I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...)
It seems that with a set of "reasonable defaults", there wouldn't be a need for jar files, META-INF information, and xml files.
I an sympathy with your views.
see Scripting Support in Mustang(JDK6.0) http://www.ociweb.com/jnb/jnbFeb2006.html
and Bean Scripting Framework http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/index.html -
4. Re: Future Architecture?
monjbossid Apr 1, 2006 9:21 AM (in response to charliekelly)"bkeh12" wrote:
I would think a scripting framework based deployment would be more approriate (bsh, groovy, ...)
It seems that with a set of "reasonable defaults", there wouldn't be a need for jar files, META-INF information, and xml files.
I an sympathy with your views.
see Scripting Support in Mustang(JDK6.0) http://www.ociweb.com/jnb/jnbFeb2006.html
and Bean Scripting Framework http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/index.html
Hi, is this meaning something like single class file with deployment scrits inside the same class file would be enough for deployment? cool.. -
5. Re: Future Architecture?
bkeh12 Apr 2, 2006 9:00 PM (in response to charliekelly)Hi,
Yup .... odic :-) -
6. Re: Future Architecture?
monjbossid Apr 3, 2006 6:13 AM (in response to charliekelly)"bkeh12" wrote:
Hi,
Yup .... odic :-)
Hi, I wish to see jboss microcontainer work this way as soon as possible
:-)