This content has been marked as final.
Show 7 replies
-
1. Re: Invocation of ESB action using POJO
marklittle Jan 8, 2008 3:20 PM (in response to vikas_sm)An Action (or pipeline of Actions) represents a service. Are you after an in-process transport, where a client can call a service (aka Action) that resides within the same address space (VM)?
-
2. Re: Invocation of ESB action using POJO
vikas_sm Jan 8, 2008 3:22 PM (in response to vikas_sm)Yes,you got it right.
Sorry for the confusion. -
3. Re: Invocation of ESB action using POJO
marklittle Jan 11, 2008 7:52 AM (in response to vikas_sm)We have an InVM transport already, but it's not in the trunk and won't be until after the SOA Platform goes out. If you want to check it out, then look for the bramley branch in svn.
-
4. Re: Invocation of ESB action using POJO
tfennelly Jan 11, 2008 7:59 AM (in response to vikas_sm)"mark.little@jboss.com" wrote:
We have an InVM transport already, but it's not in the trunk and won't be until after the SOA Platform goes out. If you want to check it out, then look for the bramley branch in svn.
And it wouldn't be all that much trouble to merge it over to trunk ;-) -
5. Re: Invocation of ESB action using POJO
marklittle Jan 11, 2008 8:11 AM (in response to vikas_sm)CP1 merges have priority ;-) Let's not put potential problems in the way of the SOA-P release please.
-
6. Re: Invocation of ESB action using POJO
tfennelly Jan 11, 2008 8:19 AM (in response to vikas_sm)"mark.little@jboss.com" wrote:
CP1 merges have priority ;-) Let's not put potential problems in the way of the SOA-P release please.
SOA-P is not working off the trunk?? -
7. Re: Invocation of ESB action using POJO
marklittle Jan 11, 2008 8:54 AM (in response to vikas_sm)No and it never has been. You need to read your email from about 3 months back ;-)