I've commented on this jira because I'm not sure where is the problem.
guys, just vote in a issue and please be patient. we have not only this one nut many other also.. And we should hear all of you in the same time and plan the fixes by priority.
according to Ilya's posting a link to this thread has been added to the bug report.
It was great to see your interest into this issue. And I would appreciate it
if this thread could be used to exchange further bits of understanding
of the implementation of the scrollableDataTable.
I totally agree with you that the setting of the data does not correspond to the processing of the parameter <>:si in the request processing.
could be senseful?
Yes but I don't see any documentation to know the meaning of the four parameters parsed and specially the fourth one. Maybe the CLIENT_ROW_KEY should be initialized to a default value when none is provided (i.e. when the array.length < 4) ?