Generall overhead in XHR response?! That makes ...| JBoss.org Content Archive (Read Only)

1 2 Previous Next 19 Replies Latest reply on Jan 30, 2008 3:18 AM by stevoffm Go to original post

15. Re: Generall overhead in XHR response?! That makes no sense.

stevoffm Jan 29, 2008 6:35 PM (in response to stevoffm)

Okay could not wait unitil tomorrow...

Just checked it on another computer and still the same...

Have the same results as mail.micke posted...

I tried it with a more professional tool called Fiddler2 runs on IE7

Results:

Request Count: 1

Bytes Sent: 718

Bytes Received: 984

ACTUAL PERFORMANCE

--------------

Requests started at: 00:06:30:0625

Responses completed at: 00:06:30:3281

Total Sequence time: 00:00:00.2656250

RESPONSE CODES

--------------

HTTP/200: 1

RESPONSE BYTES (by Content-Type)

--------------

~headers: 285

text/xml: 699

so in this case response has only 699 Bytes. Response Content:

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><link href="/richfaces-demo/a4j_3_1_3.GAorg/richfaces/skin.xcss/DATB/eAFjlbr0AAAC6gHS.jsf" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" /><script src="/richfaces-demo/a4j_3_1_3.GAorg/ajax4jsf/framework.pack.js.jsf" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="/richfaces-demo/a4j_3_1_3.GAorg/richfaces/ui.pack.js.jsf" type="text/javascript"></script></head><body><span id="j_id213:outtext">a</span><meta name="Ajax-Update-Ids" content="j_id213:outtext" /><span id="ajax-view-state"><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="javax.faces.ViewState" value="_id35352" /></span><meta id="Ajax-Response" name="Ajax-Response" content="true" /></body></html>

so its like sergey's result....

Why ist firebug showing something else?!

Also I tried DebugBar for IE as a third tool and its more like fiddlers results but also slightly different... Well I guess firebug is wrong and can't be used for profiling.

Does sw. has further information on this?
Actions

16. Re: Generall overhead in XHR response?! That makes no sense.

stevoffm Jan 29, 2008 6:37 PM (in response to stevoffm)

Again response content but this time with code tags :)

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><link
 href="/richfaces-demo/a4j_3_1_3.GAorg/richfaces/skin.xcss/DATB/eAFjlbr0AAAC6gHS.jsf"
 type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" /><script
src="/richfaces-demo/a4j_3_1_3.GAorg/ajax4jsf/framework.pack.js.jsf"
type="text/javascript"></script><script
src="/richfaces-demo/a4j_3_1_3.GAorg/richfaces/ui.pack.js.jsf"
type="text/javascript"></script></head><body><span
id="j_id213:outtext">a</span><meta name="Ajax-Update-Ids"
content="j_id213:outtext" /><span id="ajax-view-state"><input
type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="javax.faces.ViewState"
value="_id35352" /></span><meta id="Ajax-Response"
name="Ajax-Response" content="true" /></body></html>

17. Re: Generall overhead in XHR response?! That makes no sense.

sergeysmirnov Jan 29, 2008 7:31 PM (in response to stevoffm)

Ok. I have found the difference. You and Micke look at "Net" tab of the fireBug. However, I look at "Console" tab (look at me screenshot)

Yes,the "Net" tab of FireBug is buggy. As I said above, it shows the wrong transfer size and transfer time for cached resources. It looks like it does the same for Ajax traffic.

P.S. I have the same version here - FireBug 1.05
Actions
18. Re: Generall overhead in XHR response?! That makes no sense.

mail.micke Jan 30, 2008 3:10 AM (in response to stevoffm)

Aha,
same same as Sergey when looking at the console tab.
Actions
19. Re: Generall overhead in XHR response?! That makes no sense.

stevoffm Jan 30, 2008 3:18 AM (in response to stevoffm)

Hi,

I have Firebug 1.05, too. You're right Sergey, in the console tab everything is displayed correctly. The cache-thing sounds like an explanation. So this issue seems solved!

But it's a confusing thing, anyway...

Cheers
Actions

1 2 Previous Next

Go to original post