-
-
2. Re: JDJ Poll
ggreaves May 8, 2003 2:24 PM (in response to ggreaves)yesterday was over 320 difference. Websphere has hardly moved at all.
-
3. Re: JDJ Poll
marc.fleury May 8, 2003 4:47 PM (in response to ggreaves)it is the second time they do this.
we were leading by 300 then they 'sent a memo' and went back to 150 in one day and then we pulled back to 300 and then they sent another memo and we were down to 1 (!!!!!)
at the moment of this post it is back to 30 :) and in a couple of weeks we should be back to 300.
I don't think asking your company to vote is illegal by JDJ :) so eventually BEA could get ahead by getting the cleaning lady to vote.
So it goes, we will win it -
4. Re: JDJ Poll
jonlee May 10, 2003 12:52 AM (in response to ggreaves)Darn! They're now ahead by 100. Darn those cleaners!!
-
5. Re: JDJ Poll
jonlee May 13, 2003 7:24 AM (in response to ggreaves)OK. Now how did the JBoss vote drop to 390?
-
6. Re: JDJ Poll
ggreaves May 13, 2003 7:37 AM (in response to ggreaves)390? now try 385. The fix is in. I guess JBoss Group doesn't spend enough money advertising in sys-con publications.
-
7. Re: JDJ Poll
ggreaves May 13, 2003 8:21 AM (in response to ggreaves)It would seem they've fixed the problem with the voting. Not sure what's going on over there.
-
8. Re: JDJ Poll
tobias May 14, 2003 5:49 AM (in response to ggreaves)BEA leads again. But I think the JBoss numbers have been higher (!) before than now. Do they have some "cleaning" process running that kills duplicates or such ?
Anyway I wonder who is voting for BEA. I can't find a single link from BEA's website to the voting site. Just some very old posts in their newsgroups. What is going on there ? -
9. Re: JDJ Poll
juhalindfors May 14, 2003 7:24 AM (in response to ggreaves)the serverside effect I suppose.
-
10. Re: JDJ Poll
jonlee May 14, 2003 11:30 AM (in response to ggreaves)More like the randomizer effect. ;) Now they're leading by 300 at 3200. Darn they have a lot of cleaners. :P