I like to discuss the project naming conventions a bit more, and hopefully settle on something. Steve Ebersole brought up a couple of things including:
Should we separate commercial-only from open projects with org and com? So for example we would have a standard groupId of:
org.jboss.${project-name} for open source products, and commercial projects (JBoss ON?) would have com.jboss.${project-name}
This naming scheme would follow the maven recommendations:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html
Artifact IDs could be jboss-${project}-${subproject} to make sure that we don't have any naming conflicts.
