Splitting the rest of MC

[alesj]

After all these:
- http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131537
- http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131494
- http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131166
- http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=131104

And it looks like Deployers are also already out.

What should we do with the rest?
- dependency
- kernel
- docs
- aop-mc-int
- spring-int
- guice-int
- reliance
- osgi-int

OK, osgi-int is an obvious one, I'll move it out asap.
Should we do an mc-int with aop-mc, spring, guice, reliance?

And just keep dependency, kernel and docs as they are?
But I would give them different 'group' name.

[alesj]

Aha, just saw this:
- http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/reliance/

[alesj]

"alesj" wrote:

OK, osgi-int is an obvious one, I'll move it out asap.

http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/jboss-osgi/
:-)

[adrian.brock]

Give me chance to finish it then I'll explain it in due course.

[alesj]

Give me chance to finish it then I'll explain it in due course.

OK, I'll restrain myself for a bit more. :-)

[alesj]

Perhaps putting a Category here:
- http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa
To get all the newly created JIRAs under same category/group - MC or something ...

[adrian.brock]

"alesj" wrote:
Perhaps putting a Category here:
- http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa
To get all the newly created JIRAs under same category/group - MC or something ...

I've created a Microcontainer category.

[alesj]

I've created a Microcontainer category.

Any reason why JBMICROCONT isn't part of it?

[adrian.brock]

"alesj" wrote:

I've created a Microcontainer category.

Any reason why JBMICROCONT isn't part of it?

It is now :-)

[alesj]

I've created a Microcontainer category.

I guess JBVFS belongs there too.

[adrian.brock]

"alesj" wrote:

I've created a Microcontainer category.

I guess JBVFS belongs there too.

The VFS isn't really part of the MC. It was just developed there first
for convenience.

The metadata repository, reflection, MetaType and Managed
really fall into the same category. No dependency on the core MC projects.

But they are more obviously associated with the MC/Deployers project since they are
their biggest consumers.

[alesj]

The VFS isn't really part of the MC. It was just developed there first
for convenience.

The metadata repository, reflection, MetaType and Managed
really fall into the same category. No dependency on the core MC projects.

But they are more obviously associated with the MC/Deployers project since they are their biggest consumers.

Yup, but that's the same with VFS.
Its only (current) other consumer is AS, and even that goes (strictly) through deployers.
I see this category more as who's developing (where it came from) that than what it actually does.
e.g. Labs category ;-)

[starksm64]

JBVFS is closer to an mc project than labs in my view. But then, I have never paid attention to the jira top-level categories.

[alesj]

JBVFS is closer to an mc project than labs in my view. But then, I have never paid attention to the jira top-level categories.

Me neither, but not having VFS there as well (almost) defeats the whole purpose of creating MC category.
Being inconsistent on something that is already inconsistent. :-)