This content has been marked as final.
Show 19 replies
-
15. Re: jBPM : Couldn't be that complicated...
kukeltje Mar 27, 2007 6:06 PM (in response to viniciuscarvalho)They are for fresh installs, not updates from 3.1 to 3.2
The only tables missing are the identity tables. but those are straightfoward -
16. Re: jBPM : Couldn't be that complicated...
lfelser Mar 27, 2007 8:30 PM (in response to viniciuscarvalho)I have been floundering for a few hours here after upgrading to 3.2 and I think this little quote would answer all my problems, IFF I knew which "other post" you were referencing here:
"kukeltje" wrote:
you do not need to fill any other table. One important thing however is that you do have to configure the login module. (as is described in the other post).
If you have problems, please file as much relevant info (but not more) so we can help you better.
Regarding the transitions, there is lots of info on this in the forum and the examples. Just a message like above is not enough info for us to help you.
...so close! -
17. Re: jBPM : Couldn't be that complicated...
mputz Mar 29, 2007 3:42 AM (in response to viniciuscarvalho)If you are still interested in working mysql db scripts, look at this wiki entry http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JbpmOnTomcat and the sql scripts I have attached to it.
Regards,
Martin -
18. Re: jBPM : Couldn't be that complicated...
viniciuscarvalho Mar 29, 2007 6:55 PM (in response to viniciuscarvalho)"mputz" wrote:
If you are still interested in working mysql db scripts, look at this wiki entry http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JbpmOnTomcat and the sql scripts I have attached to it.
Regards,
Martin
Thanks Martin, yesterday I got it working by using 3.2 scripts + the identity scripts. I know it took me a while to figure it out, but I'm wondering why the identity tables are not on the scripts for 3.2 anymore. All this confusion I've made (and problably many users) it's just because the scripts are not complete....
Thanks for the great addition to the wiki :)
Regards -
19. Re: jBPM : Couldn't be that complicated...
kukeltje Mar 30, 2007 4:54 AM (in response to viniciuscarvalho)Lots of confusion could have been prevented by reading the getting started. Most is still valid (especially the identity DDL, since they have *never* been part of the other scripts)