This content has been marked as final.
Show 3 replies
-
1. Re: nice performance test SEAM-JSF and Wicket
shane.bryzak Jan 12, 2010 12:14 PM (in response to nimo22)I think Pete got a similar result when he tested the speed of the Seam Booking example in Wicket vs JSF. Wicket is certainly fast.
-
2. Re: nice performance test SEAM-JSF and Wicket
shane.bryzak Jan 12, 2010 12:15 PM (in response to nimo22)Heh I just noticed that the author of the article's name is Peter also - I was referring to our Pete though (Pete Muir).
-
3. Re: nice performance test SEAM-JSF and Wicket
nickarls Jan 12, 2010 1:01 PM (in response to nimo22)Seam 2 performance was largely tied to the (sometimes excessive) use of bijection through interceptors. That is no longer the case in Seam 3 so I would personally be surprised (bookmark this thread) if Seam 3 isn't significally faster than Seam 2...