nice performance test SEAM-JSF and Wicket

nimo22 Jan 12, 2010 11:47 AM

Hello,

there is a nice performance test between SEAM/JSF and Wicket:

.
Wicket seems to be a lot of faster than JSF/SEAM.
(I guess, this test is also represenative to SEAM3/JSF2 vs Wicket.)

What do you say about that?

1. Re: nice performance test SEAM-JSF and Wicket

shane.bryzak Jan 12, 2010 12:14 PM (in response to nimo22)

I think Pete got a similar result when he tested the speed of the Seam Booking example in Wicket vs JSF. Wicket is certainly fast.
Actions
2. Re: nice performance test SEAM-JSF and Wicket

shane.bryzak Jan 12, 2010 12:15 PM (in response to nimo22)

Heh I just noticed that the author of the article's name is Peter also - I was referring to our Pete though (Pete Muir).
Actions
3. Re: nice performance test SEAM-JSF and Wicket

nickarls Jan 12, 2010 1:01 PM (in response to nimo22)

Seam 2 performance was largely tied to the (sometimes excessive) use of bijection through interceptors. That is no longer the case in Seam 3 so I would personally be surprised (bookmark this thread) if Seam 3 isn't significally faster than Seam 2...
Actions