-
15. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
I tested creating a project and adding components and services using both Forge 1.0.2 and Forge 1.0.5, on Fedora 17 (Linux 3.4.4-5.f17.x86_64) and OpenJDK 1.7.0_03-icedtea.
-
16. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
Tested tooling on Fedora 16 x86_64 with java version "1.6.0_24" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.3) (fedora-67.1.11.3.fc16-x86_64) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b12, mixed mode)
Eclipse Indigo SR2 + JBossTools 3.3.0.v20120611-1634-H74-Final + SY tooling 0.5.0.STAGED
I created an application from scratch using the tooling, added testcase using JCAMixIn, and deployed application on AS7+SY. It works fine other than these 2 problems
- https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-929: [tooling] Add editable inboundOperation property on JCA inbound
- https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-930: Problems when using JCAMixIn in the application testing
-
17. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
I finished updating the documentation for the example I used to test. It can be found here: https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/SWITCHYARD/Quick+Start
-
18. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
That new tooling page in the docs looks great. Thanks, Rob!
-
19. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
Rob,
The screenshot for Add a SOAP Binding has a Context Mapping of "CONFIG". Can't really be sure what was done before the screenshot was taken, but the default for that dropdown should be "VALUE". That way it aligns with the default in the xsd and in the model.
Thanks,
David
-
20. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
Hey David,
That SOAP Binding control defaults to CONFIG. Can you go ahead and create a JIRA and I'll get it fixed for 0.6?
--Fitz
-
21. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
Also, it's not technically the Context Mapping. It's the SOAP Headers Type. Context Mapping rules of what to include/exclude would be a nice thing to add to the editor (if it's not there already), and applies to every binding. The SOAP Headers Type only applies to the SOAP Binding, however.
-
22. Re: Testing of staged 0.5.0.Final bits
Labels can be easily changed. I just went with what I saw in the schema and any forum/jira comments requesting the functionality in the editor. Names can be changed to protect the innocent.
That said, the Context Mapping idea is a good one. I think Keith and I actually taked about it along with some other things a couple of weeks ago and decided it needed more details before we dove in to figure out how to handle that in the editor. So if you have requirements/suggestions for that functionality, that would be awesome.
We should start capturing this sort of thing in JIRA at the very least (with linked forum discussions for additional details handled a bit more easily than comments in JIRAs) for 0.6 so we can batten the hatches and tighten the screws a bit more.
Thanks!