Chart component naming

[michpetrov]

I think the current naming of the chart sub-components is a little vague, especially when viewing the VDL doc where the components are all over the list.

The components are:

• rich:chart
• rich:legend
• rich:point
• rich:series
• rich:xaxis
• rich:yaxis

One solution would be to give all components a "chart" prefix so that it becomes more apparent what those components are for, we already have a precedent in tree (tree, treeNode, treeAdaptor) and notify (notify, notifyMessage, notifyStack). Then again, rich:column is one of the elements that can only be used inside another component and it's standing alone in the list.

What do you think?

[jhuska]

I feel the same need as you Michal. Giving there a prefix chart would be sufficient solution for me.

Just a side note, I can guess what all elements means, except the rich:series.

Regards

Juro

[manovotn]

I totally agree, docs might prove confusing the way the are.

+1 for prefix, it is a viable solution

[bleathem]

Nice observation Michal.

I'd say the rich:column doesn't have a prefix because it can be used

with a number of components, not just the table ones.

+1 for the "chart" prefix.  Can you go ahead and file a jira for

4.5.0.CR1 for this?

Brian

On 14-09-10 04:38 AM, Matej Novotny wrote:

I totally agree, docs might prove confusing the way the are.

+1 for prefix, it is a viable solution

Posted by forums

Original post: https://developer.jboss.org/message/903413#903413

_______________________________________________

richfaces-dev mailing list

[e-mail]

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev

_______________________________________________

richfaces-dev mailing list

[e-mail]

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/richfaces-dev